� Checkmate mortgages �
� About � Careers �
The Team Contact �
�
�
�
Sign Up �
News �
� �
� �
  Home | News
Home Heading
   
   
  >>

Archive for May, 2009

UK MORTGAGE MARKET - A NEW ERA

May. 20th 2009

UK MORTGAGE MARKET - A NEW ERA

 

Stephen Knight, Executive Chairman, Checkmate Mortgages

 

My diary over the last few months has included meetings across our industry, and both inside and outside Government. From this activity it is clear to me that our market is undergoing fundamental change. Those who take into this new era a wish to continue as before will likely fail. Those who embrace the change may see increased opportunity. I have set out below the headings under which I see the main changes occurring.

 

Intermediaries

 

Still considered by many in authority to be a significant cause of customer detriment, there is a growing anti-intermediary atmosphere. Hardly any of the new policy-makers were active in the mortgage market ( as I was ) when direct business dominated, and customers were abused with quotas, queues and inappropriate insurance selling. Good intermediaries deliver choice to customers and keep lenders on their pricing and service toes, but too few of those with power recognise this. I expect consultation, and subsequent action, by the FSA on the amount and  timing of procuration fees that lenders can pay, with lenders more accountable for the actions of intermediaries. This  won’t destroy the intermediary market, and the bigger firms will increase share. But it is bound to be felt in overall intermediary numbers and, as a result, customer choice. I expect new rules to additionally cover how lenders pay their sales staff.

 

Securitisation

 

Securitisation is still seen as having an important role in the mortgage market but with a very different focus. In the past securitisation was increasingly used as much as a risk transference vehicle as a funding mechanism. Given the authorities’ concerns over systemic risk and financial ‘contagion’, issuers are likely to be required to maintain the risk of the assets on their balance sheet.  Rather like the temporary Government guarantee, securitisations will be based on the covenant of the issuer rather than, as previously, the rating for the collateral, and are likely to look more like covered bonds than some of the securitisation deals of the past. Specialist lenders will need to link with the larger banks to effect securitisation deals in the future which will, in turn, reduce the supply of mortgage funds. My concern about these changes is around the law of unintended consequences. Overseas organisations not regulated by the FSA may be able to exploit loopholes that disadvantage UK institutions and issue in, for example, the US market. We must never forget that we trade in a global market, with the capital markets a sophisticated example of this.

 

Portfolio selling

 

Matching those who were good at selling mortgages, but who had limited balance sheet capacity, with those institutions with a substantial balance sheet, but less distribution coverage, was a logical market development. Many billions of loans were sold in this way to the economy’s advantage. However, some problems have emerged. Some sellers were less concerned than they should have been to ensure that all interests were aligned to the only thing that really matters long term, which is a better customer outcome. Some buyers, despite undertaking comprehensive due diligence, claim not to have understood that, in terms of subsequent arrears, prime, self cert, BTL and sub prime all perform differently, such that loans must be compared within their asset class to get a true picture. Whilst the role of portfolio trading in the demise of some financial institutions has almost certainly been over-played, the transference of assets between financial institutions is again seen by many in authority as adding to systemic market risk. Whatever the background or rights and wrongs of this argument, I don’t believe that the authorities want to see this market re-emerge and gross lending will be impacted accordingly.

 

Capital

 

Currently, the Basel II requirements apply to deposit-takers only. There is a feeling that this should apply to all lenders. I think that is extreme for wholesale-funded lenders, with no customer savings at risk, but it could happen. Whatever emerges from current discussions, the regulator will require (and are requiring) all lenders to apply higher capital ratios,  which will be felt in mortgage pricing. Discounts below the cost of funds are pretty much a thing of the past. Already, the FSA applies capital ratios to the loan to value (LTV) (which is why I feel they do not need to be prescriptive about the exact LTVs lenders can offer) with the result that above 75% LTV lending will remain restricted and expensive for the foreseeable future. But look out for secured/unsecured combinations that seek to exploit this loading by averaging rates.

 

Loan to Income (LTI)

 

I expect further regulation in the area of LTI. My guess is that the FSA will require lenders to see evidence of  income, thereby killing self cert at a stroke. I hope there is no prescription beyond that because some borrowers have a lifestyle and attitude to credit that could support borrowing of  five times income whereas other should not be lent more than two times income. Watch out for the pre-consultation discussion paper. If good sense prevails, the focus will be on more sophisticated affordability models.

 

Buy to Let (BTL)

 

I am more convinced than ever that BTL will be regulated, although this will need primary legislation. The same could apply to second charge lending.

 

Change of Government

 

Some I have spoken to are placing unrealistic expectations on an incoming Conservative government with its generally lighter regulatory touch. For a start, the election is probably a year away and anything could happen. There is also the point that the next government will have to wrestle with borrowing at historical levels. Tinkering with the mortgage market, or second-guessing the FSA, is likely to be low on their list of priorities for some years to come. I hope and expect the Tories, if elected, to scrap HIPs though at some point.

 

Where are the opportunities?

 

There are always opportunities. The key is to be open-minded about where they are likely to fall. Holding onto pre credit crunch models and values will fail. But as soon as the liquidity freeze unthaws, the opportunities will be evident. At Checkmate, having now built our new system and held our experienced and talented team together, we’ll be ready when the time comes!

 

Stephen Knight

 

 

Posted by Peter Stimson | in Our Opinion | No Comments »

“Worst of the recession may be over for Britain”

May. 12th 2009

Continuing our ‘green shoots’ theme, two interesting articles appeared in The Times today. The first cited a number of factors, including increasing activity in the housing sector and noted that the OECD, who last month had revised its forecast for UK GDP downwards, yesterday revealed that that its economic indicators for Britain had actually risen by 0.3 points. Click here for the full article  

In a second related item, focusing on the high street and housing market, postitive signs were also noted, with April year on year high street sales up by 4.6% (the biggest increase for three years). On the housing front, the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) noted that average house sales by estate agents rose to 10.6  properties betwwen February and April, up from 9.7 sales in the three montsh previous. For the full article click here

Whilst caveats accompany the above figures and caution still needs to be excercised the signs are increasingly encouraging that the recession may not be a long or a deep as many had previously thought

Posted by Peter Stimson | in Our Opinion | No Comments »

Property is now at its most affordable for the last 25 years:

May. 8th 2009

 

As most of you will have no doubt read in the media over the last few weeks,  there are various reports of ‘green shoots’ appearing in the economy. Certainly talking to friends and colleagues in and around the property market, there are increasing anecdotal stores of properties now starting to sell, particularly in the more desirable parts of London, backed up by statistics from the major estate agents of increased registrations and viewings. Whilst transactions remain low for the time being, the increased activity is being driven by potential buyers coming to the view that now is a good time to get into the property market.

 

There are a number of differing views about the extent and timing of the current property decline, with our view remaining that property prices will begin to stabilise in Q3 this year. Even if you do not share this view, one thing is very clear and that is that property is now the most affordable it has been for an entire generation.     

 

 

Property prices in a historical context

 

As we have covered in a previous blog, the house price decline of the early 1990s was more severe that most commentators generally now report. The reason for this was inflation. In 1990 inflation was running at close to and at certain points over 10% (with interest rates over 15% for a period). When you include inflation, prices in the South East actually fell, in real terms, around 45%.    

 

Whilst inflation is important, what ultimately underlies long term house prices is affordability. A key component of this is wage inflation which historically exceeds inflation by 1 – 2% per annum .  If we look at wage inflation (Office of National Statistics) and house prices (HBOS Seasonally Adjusted quarterly index)- both from the same starting point (the 1990 downturn)- and adjust both for inflation, we get the following picture:-  

 

 

 

Why most commentators get it wrong….

 

The temptation and error many people make is to draw the conclusion that that house prices are still overvalued relative to the peak of 1990 as house prices are still now above the 1990 correction point. But average earnings are just one (and arguably the more minor) of the two main components of affordability, the other being actual Interest rates. The high inflation of the early 1990s was (unsurprisingly) coupled with high interest rates. In 1990 interest rates peaked at over 15% and whilst they have fallen since this point, until the last few years, rates have generally remained significantly higher. To simply therefore look at house prices outside of their historical context is to miss the point altogether. This explains why many commentators failed to call the top and also for the same reasons why they will fail to call the bottom

House price affordability since the 1990 downturn

 

Taking inflation into consideration, houses were at their most affordable at least in the last 25 years, at the beginning of 1997. Significant prices falls in the early 1990s , followed by a period of low/stagnant house price growth against a backdrop of high inflation (by recent standards) marked the low point of prices. If we are therefore looking at the point of greatest (relative) affordability in the last 25 years, in an attempt to determine the point where the house prices could currently settle, 1997 is the logical reference point.

 

If we start both house prices (consisting of the HBOS Seasonally Adjusted quarterly Index) and affordability, (consisting of wage rises coupled with changes in interest rates), at the same point at the start of 1997 and then run them through time, the following picture emerges:-

 

 

What the graph tells us is that until mid 2003, rising wages and falling interest rates corresponded almost perfectly with rising house prices.  In short affordability in real terms through this period effectively remained unchanged. After this time house prices accelerate BUT although housing became relatively less affordable, it would be wrong to conclude that housing starts to become generally unaffordable. With 1997 representing the nadir, it could only be expected that prices moved away from this point as the market recovered.   

 

As prices have dropped over the last 18 months, so have interest rates (please note that we are using the interest rates customers typically pay NOT Bank Base Rates). With low/no inflation to speak of wages inflation will remain suppressed, but even with this it is clear that in Q3 this year we are likely to reach the last point, over 12 years ago, when housing was this affordable in real terms.  

 

 

Other factors to consider    

 

Whilst a three factor model can never hope to capture the plethora of factors that could influence house prices, the remaining factors in our view largely counteract each other. On the one hand we have rising unemployment that may deter some people from buying combined with a shortage of funding for ‘more risky’ mortgages. These are  juxtaposed against a continually (especially now new house building has largely ceased) increasing property shortage driven by an increasing population and more single occupants. Additionally and importantly, the above graph assumes that people are prepared to commit the same level of income to property purchase through the period in question. Evidence (particularly from Savills research) suggests that the level of income people are prepare to spend on getting onto the property ladder has risen significantly over the last 10 years. In short whilst the above graph may not be spot on, we feel if anything it may well underestimate affordability.

 

 

Does this mean that prices are close to stabilising?

 

Q3 2009 has and continues to be our view as to the bottom of the market and evidence we are now seeing supports this. With prices now the lowest for a generation, it is should hardly be surprising that  buyers are now coming back to the market.

 

Posted by Peter Stimson | in Our Opinion | No Comments »

  • Recent Posts

  • Links

  • Categories

  • Media Area

  • Archive

  • RSS RSS

  •  

     

    Home

    © Checkmate Mortgages Ltd. 2008 | Privacy Policy